Skip to content

Joint Tour Generation and Participation Model

Overview

The Joint Tour Generation and Participation Model determines which household members participate in joint travel activities together. This model captures the coordination aspects of household travel behavior, where family members synchronize their activities and travel arrangements for efficiency, companionship, or necessity.

Model Purpose

Primary Function: Determine which household members participate in joint tours and the characteristics of these coordinated travel patterns.

Key Decisions:

  • Whether household generates joint tours
  • Which household members participate in each joint tour
  • Tour purpose and priority among competing activities
  • Leadership and decision-making roles within household
  • Resource allocation for joint activities

Behavioral Foundation

Household Coordination Theory

Joint Activity Benefits:

  • Efficiency: Shared transportation costs and parking
  • Companionship: Social interaction during travel and activities
  • Childcare: Supervision requirements for dependent members
  • Resource Sharing: Single vehicle serving multiple household members
  • Activity Complementarity: Activities that benefit from joint participation

Coordination Constraints:

  • Scheduling: Alignment of individual schedules and preferences
  • Mobility: Vehicle availability and driving capability requirements
  • Activity Compatibility: Activities that can be reasonably shared
  • Spatial Feasibility: Reasonable travel distances for all participants
  • Time Budget: Available time for coordinated activities

Decision Hierarchy

  1. Joint Activity Generation: Household propensity for coordinated activities
  2. Participation Composition: Which members participate in joint activities
  3. Activity Priority: Ordering when multiple joint opportunities exist
  4. Leadership Assignment: Primary decision-maker and trip organizer

Model Structure

Joint Tour Types

Shopping Tours:

  • Participants: Adults, teenagers, children requiring supervision
  • Characteristics: Flexible timing, shared purchasing decisions
  • Benefits: Bulk purchasing, shared carrying capacity, family preferences

Social/Recreation Tours:

  • Participants: All household members, often including children
  • Characteristics: Leisure timing, entertainment and social activities
  • Benefits: Family bonding, shared experiences, cost sharing

Personal Business Tours:

  • Participants: Adults, accompanied children
  • Characteristics: Scheduled appointments, errands
  • Benefits: Childcare during appointments, efficiency of combined trips

Escort Tours (Special Case):

  • Participants: Adult + child/dependent
  • Characteristics: School, activity drop-off/pick-up
  • Benefits: Supervision, safety, transportation access

Participation Rules and Constraints

Age-Based Participation:

Children (0-15): Can participate in any joint tour type
                Must be accompanied by adult for supervision

Teenagers (16-17): Independent participation in some activities
                  May serve as drivers if licensed
                  Subject to parental coordination preferences

Adults (18+): Full participation capability
             Can serve as tour leaders and drivers
             Make primary household coordination decisions

Seniors (65+): May have mobility limitations affecting participation
              Preferences for familiar activities and destinations

Vehicle and Mobility Constraints:

Driver Requirements: At least one licensed driver must participate
                    Driver capability affects tour feasibility

Vehicle Capacity: Physical capacity limits on participation
                 Comfort considerations for long tours

Mobility Needs: Wheelchair accessibility requirements
               Walking distance limitations for some members

Utility Framework for Joint Tour Generation

Household Propensity Model:

U_JointTour = ASC_Joint + 
              beta_hhsize * household_size +
              beta_children * number_children +
              beta_workers * number_workers +
              beta_autos * autos_per_adult +
              beta_income * income_category +
              beta_lifecycle * household_lifecycle +
              beta_density * residential_density +
              beta_weekend * weekend_indicator

Key Variables:

  • Household Size: More members increase coordination opportunities and needs
  • Presence of Children: Strong driver for joint activities (supervision, family time)
  • Worker Status: Employment schedules affect coordination feasibility
  • Auto Availability: Vehicle access enables joint travel
  • Income Level: Resources for joint activities and transportation
  • Life Cycle Stage: Young families vs. empty nesters have different patterns
  • Residential Location: Urban vs. suburban affects joint activity opportunities

Participation Composition Model

Person-Level Participation Utility:

U_Participate = ASC_person_type +
                beta_age * age_category +
                beta_gender * gender +
                beta_student * student_status +
                beta_worker * employment_status +
                beta_driver * driver_status +
                beta_mandatory * mandatory_commitments +
                beta_previous * previous_joint_participation +
                person_type_interactions

Participation Patterns by Household Structure:

Two-Adult Household:

  • High joint participation rates for shopping and social activities
  • Coordination around work schedules and individual responsibilities
  • Shared decision-making and tour leadership

Family with Children:

  • Adult-child combinations most common
  • Parent serves as driver and supervisor
  • Children’s activity schedules drive timing decisions

Single Parent Household:

  • Limited joint tour generation due to single adult responsibilities
  • Children accompany parent on necessary activities
  • Efficiency-focused rather than recreation-focused

Multi-Generational Household:

  • Complex coordination involving seniors and adult children
  • Mobility limitations may affect participation patterns
  • Shared caregiving responsibilities influence joint activities

Activity Purpose and Timing

Purpose-Specific Participation Patterns

Shopping Tours:

Typical Participants: Adult + Adult (couples)
                     Adult + Children (family shopping)
                     Adult + Senior (assistance/companionship)

Timing Preferences: Weekend mornings (family time)
                   Weekday evenings (after work)
                   Avoid peak commute periods

Activity Characteristics: Multiple stops common
                         Bulk purchasing opportunities
                         Entertainment/social aspects

Social/Recreation Tours:

Typical Participants: Entire household (family outings)
                     Adult + Children (parent-child activities)
                     Adult couples (evening/weekend entertainment)

Timing Preferences: Weekends and holidays
                   Evening hours (after work/school)
                   School holiday periods

Activity Characteristics: Longer duration activities
                         Destination-focused (parks, events, restaurants)
                         Seasonal and weather-dependent

Personal Business Tours:

Typical Participants: Adult + Children (appointments, errands)
                     Adult couples (major purchases, services)

Timing Preferences: Weekday business hours
                   Saturday mornings
                   Scheduled appointment times

Activity Characteristics: Time-constrained activities
                         Often combined with other purposes
                         Location-specific requirements

Spatial and Temporal Constraints

Geographic Feasibility

Distance Considerations:

  • Joint tours typically involve longer distances than individual tours
  • Multiple household members must find destinations acceptable
  • Return travel coordination affects destination choice

Activity Location Clusters:

  • Shopping centers and malls facilitate joint activities
  • Recreation destinations serve multiple age groups
  • Medical/service clusters serve multiple household needs

Scheduling Coordination

Temporal Alignment:

Work Schedule Constraints: Available windows for joint activities
                          Weekend vs. weekday opportunities
                          Shift work affecting coordination

School Schedule Integration: Coordination around school hours
                           Holiday and summer schedule changes
                           After-school activity participation

Individual Commitment Conflicts: Mandatory activities limit availability
                                Personal appointments reduce flexibility
                                Social commitments compete for time

Model Implementation Framework

Sequential Decision Process

  1. Joint Tour Generation Decision (Household Level)
  2. Probability of generating joint tours by purpose
  3. Number of joint tours by day type and purpose

  4. Household propensity based on demographics and constraints

  5. Participation Composition (Person Level)

  6. Which household members participate in each joint tour
  7. Leadership and decision-making role assignment

  8. Vehicle allocation and driving responsibilities

  9. Activity Scheduling (Tour Level)

  10. Integration with individual mandatory activities
  11. Time-of-day coordination among participants
  12. Duration and activity sequence planning

Integration with Individual Models

Coordination with Individual Tour Generation:

  • Joint tours reduce need for individual tours of same purpose
  • Remaining individual activity needs after joint tour participation
  • Resource allocation between joint and individual activities

Mode Choice Implications:

  • Joint tours typically use household vehicles
  • Higher vehicle occupancy affects mode choice utilities
  • Parking and access requirements for multiple passengers

Data Requirements and Calibration

Survey Data Sources

Activity-Based Travel Surveys:

  • Household activity diaries showing joint participation patterns
  • Activity purpose, timing, and participant composition
  • Stated coordination preferences and constraints

Time Use Surveys:

  • Within-household activity coordination patterns
  • Joint activity participation by household type
  • Time allocation for family vs. individual activities

Calibration Targets

Joint Tour Generation Rates by Household Type:

Two-Adult Households: 
- Shopping: 2.1 joint tours per week
- Social/Recreation: 1.4 joint tours per week
- Personal Business: 0.8 joint tours per week

Families with Children:
- Shopping: 1.8 joint tours per week  
- Social/Recreation: 2.2 joint tours per week
- Personal Business: 1.1 joint tours per week

Single Parent Households:
- All Purposes: 0.7 joint tours per week (mostly with children)

Participation Composition Patterns:

  • Adult couples: 45% of joint shopping tours
  • Adult + children: 35% of joint social tours
  • Whole household: 25% of joint recreation tours

Model Validation

Behavioral Reasonableness:

  • Higher joint activity rates for households with children
  • Weekend and evening peaks for joint social activities
  • Reduced individual tour generation with joint participation

Demographic Sensitivity:

  • Income effects on joint recreation activities
  • Vehicle availability impacts on joint tour feasibility
  • Life cycle stage differences in coordination patterns

Policy Applications and Insights

Transportation Planning Applications

Vehicle Occupancy Impacts:

  • Joint tours increase average vehicle occupancy
  • HOV lane usage patterns and effectiveness
  • Parking demand estimation for family destinations

Transit Service Planning:

  • Family-friendly transit service design
  • Off-peak service for joint activities
  • Multi-generational accessibility requirements

Land Use Planning Integration

Activity Center Design:

  • Mixed-use developments facilitating joint activities
  • Family-oriented retail and recreation clustering
  • Parking design for family vehicles and mobility needs

Neighborhood Planning:

  • Walkable environments supporting joint activities
  • Safe routes for family walking and cycling
  • Community facility programming for joint activities

Policy Sensitivity Analysis

Work Schedule Flexibility:

  • Telecommuting effects on household coordination opportunities
  • Flexible work hours enabling joint activities
  • Compressed work weeks and family time allocation

Transportation Pricing:

  • Congestion pricing impacts on joint tour timing
  • Parking pricing effects on joint activity participation
  • Transit family fare structures and usage

This Joint Tour Generation and Participation Model provides essential insights into household coordination behavior, supporting transportation planning that recognizes the family context of travel decisions and the efficiency benefits of coordinated household activities.